The debate regarding the pros and cons of various frameworks and libraries has taken its footing among the developers. The average web developer uses these developmental tools daily to code everything from simple to complex functionalities.
Technologies such as Jekyll, Hugo, Gatsby.JS, and Next.JS are usually used to power sophisticated websites that are looking to improve their speed to secure a better ranking. Since Gatsby.JS and Next.JS are at the forefront of these technologies, the debate surrounding them is more nuanced than the rest.
To participate in this debate and exhaustively understand the comparison, you need to develop a fundamental understanding of both frameworks.
Read on to find out more about them.
Gatsby.JS is typically used to build a website that generates static HTML in advance, which can subsequently be stored on CDNs (Content Delivery Network) across the globe to facilitate quicker access.
Gatsby.JS combines the best portions of GraphQL, React, and react-router to yield a static site generator that is increasingly developer-friendly.
From another perspective, Gatsby can also be visualized as a modern front-end framework that allows for extremely fast page-loads. It does so by using features such as data prefetching, asset optimization, server-side rendering, and code splitting, among many others.
Gatsby is mostly used for building those websites where the number of pages is predictable, and the content mostly remains static.
While using the Gatsby ecosystem, a developer has the luxury of choosing more than one way to build a website. This is because of the extensive presence of easily adjustable plugins, themes, and starters in the framework. Gatsby plugins are capable of extending and modifying almost everything that Gatsby does.
Also, Gatsby JS has more starting themes and templates than any other Framework.
Additionally, it offers support from various REST APIs, GraphQL, CMS systems, and databases.
Next.JS is employed primarily to build server-side rendered websites which generate the HTML dynamically through a server during every instance of receiving a new request.
On the other hand, it also supports static page generation, CDN caching, and all the benefits of static page generation.
Hence, Next.JS is considered the ideal tool for setting up dynamic websites with healthy interactions with their server.
The process uses features such as Single File components, Automatic Code Splitting, Hot Code Reloading, and the like to enable developers to build attractive React Websites.
Usually, Next is leveraged when you need a website that supports both SSR and Static page optimization.
Next JS offers more freedom of creating applications. It doesn’t package with unnecessary tools, and it doesn’t create assumptions on how you want to manage data.
It’s a great framework for building large-scale applications.
Next.JS vs. Gatsby.JS- Comparison Table — Listing categories with the biggest differences, Next.JS has other features Gatsby not supporting fully. Next JS “limited” support is viewed as a benefit since it’s providing developers with freedom of customization.
Both Next and Gatsby are extremely impressive frameworks, and users are advised to be mindful of their project requirements at the outset before they opt for either framework.
While Gatsby is the ideal choice for static websites, Next presents itself as the most logical option for server-side dynamic websites.
However, since Gatsby as a framework plays host to a wide offering of themes, plugins, and templates, developers looking to set up a fully operational application or website in minimal time usually prefer Gatsby over Next JS.
Choose for yourself. Both of them are amazing! (: